## News

#### May 6, 2014

##### The theory of new, conserving energy, diffusion is formulated and an interpretation of quantum mechanics as describing such diffusion in vacuum is proposed

*Z. Zakir *(2014)* Theory of conservative diffusion in classical and quantum systems.*

TPAC, **9**, 1, p. 18 – 32, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.4874-036

##### The theory of conservative thermodiffusion is formulated and an interpretation of gravitation as such thermodiffusion in vacuum is proposed

*Z. Zakir *(2014) *Gravitation as a thermodiffusion in the physical vacuum*.

TPAC, **9**, 1, p. 33 – 53, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.4874-037

##### The redshift stasis and luminosity amplification effects for radiation crossed galaxy clusters are described and the data for supernovae and CMB are revised

*Z. Zakir *(2014)* New effects in cosmology: frequency and intensity stasis for radiation crossed galaxy clusters.*

TPAC, **9**, 1, p. 5 – 17, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.4874-035

##### 5D closed model obeying the local energy conservation condition, also leading to the model of ”Miniverse”, is formulated

*Z. Zakir *(2014) *A model of the closed universe gravitating in 4-space*.

TPAC, **9**, 1, p. 1 – 4, doi: 10.9751/TPAС.4874-034

#### November 13, 2013

##### An improved version of the Friedmann closed model obeying the local energy conservation condition is proposed and a model of ”Miniverse” is discovered

*Z. Zakir *(2013) *Models of the Universe with strongly conserved energy of matter*.** **

TPAC, **8**, 3, p. 67 – 74, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.4700-033

##### The crystallization without merging of systems of gravitationally frozen objects is discovered

*Z. Zakir *(2013)* On the theory of relativistic collapse and relativistic explosion. *

*3. The frozar and frozon crystallizations.*

TPAC, **8**, 3, p. 62 – 66, doi: 10.9751/TPAС.4700-032

#### May 15, 2013

##### New version of the closed model with relativistic redshift and aberration are proposed

*Z. Zakir *(2013)* The closed model of the universe with relativistic redshift*

TPAC, **8**, 2, p. 24 – 36, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.4518-030

*Z. Zakir (2013) *The closed model of the universe with relativistic effects of extra dimension.

TPAC, **8**, 2, p. 37 – 61, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.4518-031

#### April 15, 2013

##### New observable effects in cosmology for radiation crossed galaxy clusters are discovered and the data for supernovae and CMB are revised

*Z. Zakir* (2013)* Redshift stasis of photons at crossing the gravitationally-bound regions revises the supernovae data*,

TPAC, **8**, 1, p. 1 – 6, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.4488-027

* Z. Zakir *(2013)

*The frequency and intensity stasis effects for radiation crossed galaxy clusters.**1. Localized sources. *

TPAC, **8**, 1, p. 7 – 15, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.4488-028

* 2. Isotropy and anisotropy of CMB. *

TPAC, **8**, 1, p. 16 – 23, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.4488-029

#### 2012

##### The theory of relativistic collapse with formation of gravitationally-frozen objects – frozars (frozen stars) and frozons (frozen quanta) is formulated and also the theory of quasistable states – glowsars, which can explode relativistically, is proposed

* Z. Zakir *(2012)

*On the theory of relativistic collapse and relativistic explosion.**1. Collapse without horizon and formation of frozars.*

TPAC, **7**, 1, p. 1 – 13, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.4100-024* *

* 2. Quasistable states as glowsars and bursts at recollapse.*

TPAC, **7**, 1, p. 14 – 20, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.4100-025

*Z. Zakir* (2012) *Dialogues about a fate of stars: from black holes to frozars*

TPAC, **7**, 2, p. 21 – 37, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.4200-026

#### 2011

##### The theory of a harmonic rotator is formulated and on its basis the method of rotatory quantization of particles and fields, not containing the zero-point vacuum energy, is proposed

*Z. Zakir* (2011) *Models of soft rotators and the theory of a harmonic rotator*

TPAC, **6**, 1, p. 1 – 13, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.3800-020

* Z. Zakir *(2011)

*Rotatory quantization of charge-conjugation symmetric systems.**1. Harmonic oscillators. *

TPAC, **6**, 1, p. 14 – 30, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.3900-021

* 2. Harmonic and magneto-harmonic rotators. *

TPAC, **6**, 1, p. 31 – 47, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.3900-022

* 3. Relativistic fields.
*

TPAC, **6**, 1, p. 48 – 63, doi: 10.9751/TPAC.4000-023

** ____________________________________________________________
**

#### September 28, 2012

##### DOI international Code for publications of the journal

Since September 28, 2012 * Centre for Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics* (CTPA, Tashkent, Uzbekistan) is a member of PILA – *The Publishers International Linkage Association*, registering DOI international standard code for digital objects.

The official DOI code prefix for CTPA is 10.9751

For any publication the publisher can freely define its interior suffix after DOI code prefix. For the journals published by CTPA as *journal’s code* are accepted:

10.9751/TPAC. and 10.9751/TFAK.

with inserting after the point an *interior code of a publication* in this journal.

For* an interior code of the publication* in CTPA is accepted following system:

(a publication day). (an order number of publication)

As a day of publication is accepted a number of days from 01/01/2001, i.e. *number of days of current century* (and millenium). As a result, DOI codes for the first paper in English and Russian issues of the journal look like

10.9751/TPAC.2091.001 and 10.9751/TFAK.2091.001

since the day of publication 09/22/2006 corresponds to 2091-th day of the century.

Since 2009 the journal’s issues are published in dates, multiple to 100 days, since the date 03/19/2009, corresponded to 3000-th day of the century (4000-th day has occurred at 12/14/2011).

#### September 18, 2012

##### Welcome to the new site of the journal!

New site of the journal *Theoretical Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology* is started!

The content of issues is still free for downloading up to starting of subscription program.

The discussion of articles is welcomed.* Comment* section of any abstract page is available for professional scientists, educators and students.

Popular discussion of ideas and results, including social aspects, is available at Forum of Theor-Phys.org portal.

Great content like this isn’t easy to find online. You have given the world a wonderful article with many good points to consider. I agree with a lot of your views and enjoyed this article.

Thanks. This is first open response.

Still lack of response of professionals I understand as “Silence gives consent”.

Silence may be golden, but silence is not a form of consent.

In the scientific dispute silence means consent when a true solution contradicts to interests of “mainstream” due to crash of reputation of leading persons.

This is an ordinary phenomenon at paradigm shifting periods (see Kuhn’s book).

Notice, my reply to you in the LinkedIn blog has been removed by moderator. So, if you interested by real science, describing real world, and can read the research papers, not only their abstracts, below I present my reply without censorship:

“@Peter: “as I learned GR, the proper time continues on at it’s “proper rate” as objects fall towards the event horizon of a black hole. The distant observer sees the motion of the object slow down, slower and slower as the event horizon is approached – so that in the limit the object appears frozen at the event horizon.

But in the objects reference frame it is actually accelerating, and will zoom right through the event horizon. ”

Peter, as you “learned” is not GR, but BH paradigm, which is illegal hybrid of GR by Newtonian BHs and contains obvious internal contradictions. Main of them is following:

As you know, in GR the worldline r(t) of a particle on a falling dust shell, parametrized across world time t, does not cross grav.radius 2M eternally r(t)>2M, while exists our Universe – this simply follows from the Schw. solution, an exact solution of Einstein eq.

You also must know, that in GR the worldline, not only its small intervals, is invariant, and set of events along it does not change at any parametrization, thus at turning to proper times tau(t), as another parametrization of the same set of events, you again will come to the same restriction: r(t)=r[tau(t)]>2M.

A mistake in BH paradigm is ignoring of this constraint for any proper time moment be related by a definite moment of real world’s time t< infinity.

See also last discussion about frozars vs BHs, where I explained why GR leads only to frozars, while G.'t Hooft attempted to defend BHs:

http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=197654004&gid=3091009&commentID=110918635&trk=view_disc&ut=1TK0SywbV34lA1 "

@Peter: "you are the editor of the journal which published your paper".

We live in the period of deepest crisis in fund. sci. One of consequences of that is breaking of scientific ethics by editors of leading journals, who reject papers contradicting to "mainstream" paradigm directly or send them for peer reviewing to experts having conflict of interests.

In this situation I follow to one of best traditions of world economy – to guarantee quality of produced good by own name as a trade mark – my papers do not contain arbitrary hypotheses, internal contradictions and are based on experimentally well checked theoretical principles only. If they contradict to commonly accepted and "learned" concepts, mistaken are latter and they should be improved without hysterics.

In the case of collapse, we follow GR in the frozar picture, which described in my papers (independently where they are published!), and break GR in case of BHs.